Leadership for a Nation in Turmoil: Executive Intelligence Review; Volume 43, Issue 7 (in English)
Synopsis "Leadership for a Nation in Turmoil: Executive Intelligence Review; Volume 43, Issue 7 (in English)"
Leadership for a Nation in Turmoil Feb. 7-Lyndon LaRouche addressed associates in these terms on Feb. 7. I think the problem is, there is no will to solve the problem. The problem can be solved. First of all, the primary thing is that the financial system, the way it's operating now, is hopelessly bankrupt. Now, therefore, if the United States government were to foreclose against the fraudulent elements of investment, and just cancel them, we would have a solution. But the issue is that all the rich, - shall we say, - the rich demand that they have the first say in who gets paid and who does not. Well, if we say, we just cancelled all the pure speculators, who make no real contribution, - no physically meaningful progress, - then, if we got rid of them, we could handle the problem. And, in point of fact, not only is that a possibility, but unless we do that, - that is shut down the Obama administration on account of their frauds, - then we could all go down in chaos. If we, on the other hand, are willing to admit reality . . . For example, we've got the case of Hillary and Sanders and so forth, - all those people who are in the campaign, - well, they're all worthless. They're all intrinsically worthless. What we have to do is cancel the worthless accounts, and build in a support system for funding which will allow us to create real productive steps. That can do it. And it can be done internationally. It can be done partly by help of Russia, in a very important political way; in China, with what China is building up around itself. All of these things are things which represent immediate forms of recovery of the global economy, just by simply cashing in and cancelling the trash. That's all we have to do. If we control the cash, - what is considered to be the cash. If we decide to do it, it will work. And when people say it won't work, it's because they've decided to cling to something worthless, like Wall Street. Wall Street and its organization is an intrinsically bankrupt institution. It has to be cancelled! And if that were done with an understanding that we're doing that, that would solve the problem for the people of the United States and elsewhere. Increasing Productive Powers of Labor When people say they want this mysterious explanation of how the economy will work, - I am fully aware of what the standards are that are needed to solve the problem. I think that people are just ducking the issue, and hoping that there's some mysterious solution. The problem is that if people understand what I have been telling them for years, - and I've always been accurate on this one, - if they just pay attention to what I've been saying, and don't change the subject, we can deal with this thing. We can deal with it. But we are not the only force in play. I have the knowledge of how to deal with this problem. Others are trying to fish around and demanding an explanation of some unknown means of trying to solve the problem. I already know what the solution is. But I also know that the government, in its present form, is not willing, by any means, to save the economy. The government of the United States is not willing to tolerate, - not willing to deal with the issue which has to be applied. We don't need a mysterious explanation of how this thing can be dealt with. I'm fully aware of this, and I've been aware of this for years. But we've got to get back to what the real issue is. And the real issue is what our people, themselves, often try to avoid taking up, and then they hope that some mysterious force will actually provide a solution. It won't. I've been specifying that solution for years, and if you don't use that solution, you're wasting your time in trying to save anything. The whole nation is bankrupt. The whole United States system is bankrupted entirely. Now, I could deal with that problem if I had the authority to do so, because I know exactly what I would have t
