Libros importados con hasta 50% OFF + Envío Gratis a todo USA  Ver más

menu

0
  • argentina
  • chile
  • colombia
  • españa
  • méxico
  • perú
  • estados unidos
  • internacional
portada International Finance Discussion Papers: Quantitative Easing and Bank Lending: Evidence from Japan (in English)
Type
Physical Book
Publisher
Language
Inglés
Pages
36
Format
Paperback
Dimensions
24.6 x 18.9 x 0.2 cm
Weight
0.08 kg.
ISBN13
9781288724659

International Finance Discussion Papers: Quantitative Easing and Bank Lending: Evidence from Japan (in English)

David Bowman (Author) · United States Federal Reserve Board (Author) · Bibliogov · Paperback

International Finance Discussion Papers: Quantitative Easing and Bank Lending: Evidence from Japan (in English) - Bowman, David ; United States Federal Reserve Board ; Et Al

Physical Book

$ 13.26

$ 15.75

You save: $ 2.49

16% discount
  • Condition: New
It will be shipped from our warehouse between Monday, July 01 and Tuesday, July 02.
You will receive it anywhere in United States between 1 and 3 business days after shipment.

Synopsis "International Finance Discussion Papers: Quantitative Easing and Bank Lending: Evidence from Japan (in English)"

Prior to the recent financial crisis, one of the most prominent examples of unconventional monetary stimulus was Japan's "quantitative easing policy" (QEP). Most analysts agree that QEP did not succeed in stimulating aggregate demand sufficiently to overcome persistent deflation. However, it remains unclear whether QEP simply provided little stimulus, or whether its positive effects were overwhelmed by the contractionary forces in Japan's post-bubble economy. In the spirit of Kashyap and Stein (2000) and Hosono (2006), this paper uses bank-level data from 2000 to 2009 to examine the effectiveness in promoting bank lending of a key element of QEP, the Bank of Japan's injections of liquidity into the interbank market. We identify a robust, positive, and statistically significant effect of bank liquidity positions on lending, suggesting that the expansion of reserves associated with QEP likely boosted the flow of credit. However, the overall size of that boost was probably quite small. First, the estimated response of lending to liquidity positions in our regressions is small. Second, much of the effect of the BOJ's reserve injections on bank liquidity was offset as banks reduced their lending to each other. Finally, the effect of liquidity on lending appears to have held only during the initial years of QEP, when the banking system was at its weakest; by 2005, even before QEP was abandoned, the relationship between liquidity and lending had evaporated.

Customers reviews

More customer reviews
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)

Frequently Asked Questions about the Book

All books in our catalog are Original.
The book is written in English.
The binding of this edition is Paperback.

Questions and Answers about the Book

Do you have a question about the book? Login to be able to add your own question.

Opinions about Bookdelivery

More customer reviews