Share
Gender, Surveillance, and Literature in the Romantic Period: 1780–1830 (Routledge Studies in Surveillance) (in English)
Lucy E. Thompson (Author)
·
Taylor & Francis 2023-05-31, London,
· Paperback
Gender, Surveillance, and Literature in the Romantic Period: 1780–1830 (Routledge Studies in Surveillance) (in English) - Lucy E. Thompson
$ 52.09
$ 54.99
You save: $ 2.90
Choose the list to add your product or create one New List
✓ Product added successfully to the Wishlist.
Go to My WishlistsIt will be shipped from our warehouse between
Friday, July 12 and
Monday, July 15.
You will receive it anywhere in United States between 1 and 3 business days after shipment.
Synopsis "Gender, Surveillance, and Literature in the Romantic Period: 1780–1830 (Routledge Studies in Surveillance) (in English)"
Romantic-era literature offers a key message: surveillance, in all its forms, was experienced distinctly and differently by women than men. Gender, Surveillance, and Literature in the Romantic Period examines how familiar and neglected texts internalise and interrogate the ways in which targeted, asymmetric, and often isolating surveillance made women increasingly and uncomfortably visible in a way that still resonates today. The book combines the insights of modern surveillance studies with Romantic scholarship. It provides readers with a new context in which to understand Romantic-period texts and looks critically at emerging paradigms of surveillance directed at marginal groups, as well as resistance to such monitoring. Works by writers such as Jane Austen, Charlotte Smith, and Joanna Baillie, as well as Lord Byron and Thomas De Quincey, give a new perspective on the age that produced the Panopticon. This book is designed to appeal to a wide readership, and is aimed at students and scholars of surveillance, literature, Romanticism, and gender politics, as well as those interested in important strands of women's experience not only for the additional layers they reveal about the Romantic era but also for their relevance to current debates around asymmetries of power within gendered surveillance.
