Libros importados hasta 50% OFF + Envío Gratis a todo USA   Ver más

menu

0
  • argentina
  • chile
  • colombia
  • españa
  • méxico
  • perú
  • estados unidos
  • internacional
portada Equal Employment Opportunity: EEOC Birmingham Office Closed Discrimination Charges Without Full Investigation: Hrd-87-81 (in English)
Type
Physical Book
Publisher
Language
Inglés
Pages
34
Format
Paperback
Dimensions
24.6 x 18.9 x 0.2 cm
Weight
0.08 kg.
ISBN13
9781287155973

Equal Employment Opportunity: EEOC Birmingham Office Closed Discrimination Charges Without Full Investigation: Hrd-87-81 (in English)

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office ( (Author) · Bibliogov · Paperback

Equal Employment Opportunity: EEOC Birmingham Office Closed Discrimination Charges Without Full Investigation: Hrd-87-81 (in English) - U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (

Physical Book

$ 13.26

$ 15.75

You save: $ 2.49

16% discount
  • Condition: New
It will be shipped from our warehouse between Friday, July 12 and Monday, July 15.
You will receive it anywhere in United States between 1 and 3 business days after shipment.

Synopsis "Equal Employment Opportunity: EEOC Birmingham Office Closed Discrimination Charges Without Full Investigation: Hrd-87-81 (in English)"

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent agency that works for Congress. The GAO watches over Congress, and investigates how the federal government spends taxpayers dollars. The Comptroller General of the United States is the leader of the GAO, and is appointed to a 15-year term by the U.S. President. The GAO wants to support Congress, while at the same time doing right by the citizens of the United States. They audit, investigate, perform analyses, issue legal decisions and report anything that the government is doing. This is one of their reports. GAO found that: (1) the Birmingham office closed 29 percent of the charges without completing a full investigation; (2) the investigations were deficient because they lacked comparative documentary evidence on the respondent's treatment of the charging party compared with other employees; (3) although the EEOC compliance manual provides specific guidance on how to resolve conflicting evidence, 83 percent of the charges did not include documentary evidence corroborating the respondent's reply to the charge; and (4) district managers instructed compliance investigators to close charges with insufficient evidence. GAO also found that: (1) the district office has not conducted full investigations since EEOC established unrealistic production goals in 1978; and (2) the district office staff considers investigations to be merely paperwork processes.

Customers reviews

More customer reviews
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)

Frequently Asked Questions about the Book

All books in our catalog are Original.
The book is written in English.
The binding of this edition is Paperback.

Questions and Answers about the Book

Do you have a question about the book? Login to be able to add your own question.

Opinions about Bookdelivery

More customer reviews